InSAR analysis Infrastructure Monitoring Sentinel Imagery

InSAR Analysis and Corner Reflector Experiments for Infrastructure Stability Monitoring Using Sentinel-1 Imagery

Initially, paper abstracts were presented as a talk and as a poster at the Fringe 2023 workshop by European Space Agency.  Links to the full documents can be found at the end of this article. 

National Grid Energy Transmissions (NGET), which owns and maintains the high-voltage electricity transmission network in England and Wales, conducts invasive analysis annually to monitor the towers most at risk of movement. Moreover, the NGET inspection teams perform annual line walking activities and monthly substation inspections during which they visually assess the presence of asset motion.

These interventions are crucial to avoid issues which may cause expensive assets replacements or reconstruction. It costs NGET over £6 million per year to monitor only 1% of their most at risk assets.

National Grid Energy Transmission

Synthetic Aperture Radar Interferometry (InSAR) is an accurate Earth Observation method to monitor an asset’s stability at a much lower cost and without the need to have physical access to the assets. This technique uses SAR satellite datasets e.g., Sentinel-1 which is freely available from the European Space Agency (ESA).

Persistent Scatterer InSAR (PSI) is a novel technique to select strong, stable scatterers that remain coherent for the entire time series of radar acquisitions (Ferretti et al. 2001). In this study, we first applied conventional PSI analysis using SARPROZ software (Perissin et al.,2011) across three NGET areas of interest which each included 80 km of overhead lines (OHLs) and some underground cables and overground substations. To monitor an asset’s stability using the PSI technique, it must be possible to identify at least one data point that can be accurately and definitively assigned to the asset itself. Some assets, depending on their characteristics (e.g. size, orientation, roughness and material) and their scattering behavior are ‘natural reflectors’ providing a strong and coherent back scattered signal that can be used for PSI asset motion analyses, but not all.

One of the results of this study was an insight into the high % of towers that are not ‘natural reflectors’ and a study of how this issue could be solved by the installation of corner reflectors. Corner reflectors (CRs) can be used to enhance the backscattered signal from the target where the signal is not strong and coherent enough to be selected as a Persistent Scatterer (PS) point (Cigna et al., 206 and Kelevitz et al., 2022).

Therefore, in the next phase, we focused on designing and installing a number of CRs both on National Grid pylons, and a test site at Cranfield University, to assess their ability to make NGET assets, in particular tower monitorable when using PSI derived from free and open-source Sentinel-1 imagery. This project also set out to determine what the minimum distance between two installed CRs would need to be to still get two separate signals and therefore two distinct asset motion measurements from one single asset. We designed the CRs for these experiments to be clearly visible in images for a typical UK rural landscape away from woodland. Assuming a low vegetated background and a signal to noise ratio (SNR) equals to 10, five trihedral CRs with an inner side length of 70 cm were manufactured. In the installation phase, the CRs were fixed rigidly to a support and pointed towards the Sentinel-1 selected tracks using the local incidence angle and azimuth angle.

We mounted three CRs at the Cranfield University site, on 15th Dec 2022 in an open grassy area south-west of the runway in an L shaped formation (60 m along track and 20 m across- track), each with a 100% clear view to the Sentinel 1 satellites. We compared the amplitude time series of the pixel in which each CR was located in the three images taken before CR installation with four images taken after installation. Before doing the amplitude time series analysis, we co-registered all Sentinel-1 SLC images track 81 descending with respect to the first image after the first CR installation and georeferenced the images using a high-resolution LiDAR DEM, and finally manually corrected georeferencing using a visible feature in the SAR image.

Corner reflectors

The result of this analysis confirms that the installed CRs have a strong back scattering signal towards the satellite in comparison to the background before the installation which matches with what we expected. We then proceeded to reduce the distances between the CR’s in the North-South (along track) and East-West (across track) directions, with two experiments- 30 m along track and 10 m Across-track on 9 Jan 2023 and 5 m and 10 m in across track on 21 Jan 2023 (table 1). The results showed that as long as the spacing is more than approximately 30 m (N-S) or 7 m (E-W) then the reflectors should be visible in the amplitude images as distinct targets. As the targets merge, it is probably possible to detect that more than one reflector is present, but this may require more than a simple visual inspection to be confident of the result.

To better distinguish the signal of the two overlapping CRs in the amplitude image after installation, we applied amplitude time series analysis for all the pixels in the large bright area. The time series analysis confirmed a jump of amplitude after the CR installation for the pixels belongs to the CRs. Moreover, we applied an RGB colour composite analysis using the images before and after each installation which helped to distinguish the pixels corresponding to the installed CRs. 

The complete abstract, including tables and figures, is available for viewing and downloading here.  

The more comprehensive presentation is available for viewing and downloading here

Picture of Dr. Zahra Sadeghi
Dr. Zahra Sadeghi

Earth Observation-SAR Engineer

Our latest news:

Report Split View Customization

Spottitt Metrics Factory – May Update: New Platform Developments

Welcome to your monthly roundup of the latest updates from the Spottitt Metrics Factory platform. As always, we’re working to make your asset risk analytics experience more insightful, flexible and faster.

Future Climate Data Models Now Integrated
Understanding how climate change affects infrastructure is no longer limited to the past or current. Spottitt MF now integrates future climate scenario models, based on global models developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).

The IPCC models explore a range of future climate pathways – from best-case to worst-case scenarios – depending on how global actions and policies evolve. With this integration, users can now assess asset risk and resilience using a range of future climate models, helping make forward-looking decisions grounded in climate science.

satellite EO data providers and constellations

All About Satellite Earth Observation Data

Welcome to Spottitt “Let’s Talk Satellite EO Data” eBook – your ultimate guide to understanding satellite-derived data types, their applications in asset monitoring, of the different types of data providers, and practical tips for navigating the challenges of using remote sensing data.

This resource is designed to help you make well-informed decisions about the use and integration of EO data, ultimately to ensure the safety and performance of your critical infrastructure.

climate data layer gradient map

Spottitt MF Monthly Update: New Features & Enhancements

At Spottitt, we’re constantly working to enhance your experience with our analytics platform, by making data visualization and reporting more intuitive, flexible, and insightful. This month, we’re introducing several updates which give you even more control and customization.

🌍 Your Free Climate Data Now Displayed as a Gradient Layer in a Map Format
Just like our other data layers, your free climate data can now be viewed on the map in a compact gradient color format. While generating a report on how each climate parameter impacts your assets is the best way to match this data to your assets and can be nice to view these data layers – helping you assess environmental exposure at a glance.

asset risk report creation across multiple data layers

Introducing an Upgraded Spottitt MF 2.0: What’s New? Part 2.

The upgraded Spottitt platform now empowers users to customize reports in a single step, using multiple data layer types, filters, and display preferences.

Layer types refer to the specific input data leveraged for a monitoring use case.

Depending on the source data purchased through Spottitt MF, the available layer types might include but are not limited to: Optical Vegetation and Man Made Classes, Wind, Precipitation and Temperature Classes, SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) Land & Asset Motion Classes, Digital Elevation Data Classes.

satellite Earth Observation data for asset analysis

Introducing an Upgraded Spottitt MF 2.0: What’s New? Part 1.

As climate change intensifies and extreme weather events become more frequent and severe, it’s clear that understanding climate and weather variables is no longer just a ‘nice to have’ for asset owners. Recent disasters all over the globe, including the devastating wildfires in Los Angeles, USA, only emphasise the necessity of integrating climate and weather data into asset monitoring workflows.

Building on our past successful climate impact analytics projects, such as updating severe weather maps for SPEN, we are thrilled to announce the coming soon launch of Spottitt Metrics Factory 2.0.

Welcome to Spottitt’s Chief Technology Officer

We are thrilled to announce that Sebastian Sobocinski has joined us as Chief Technology Officer (CTO).

With a wealth of experience as a CTO, Chief Product Officer (CPO), and Software Development Director, Sebastian brings a strong background in IT project management. As he puts it, he is passionate about leveraging his extensive knowledge and skills to create value and drive impact through innovative business and technology solutions.